Obviously those who orchestrated 9/11 have everything to lose if the public finally wakes up to the truth and starts demanding real accountability and real justice. Suffice it to say that the guilty are not sitting idly by waiting for their day of reckoning. Quite to the contrary, clear evidence has revealed a large-scale campaign is underway to actively infiltrate and disrupt the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Counterintelligence Operations (known as “CoIntelPro“), or Psychological Operations (known as “PsyOps“), have been widely deployed by the C.I.A. to destabilize foreign governments, and in tyrannical fashion by J. Edgar Hoover’s F.B.I., to destabilize both the Civil Rights and Vietnam Anti-War movements. These efforts involved well organized and well funded campaigns of distraction, disinformation, discreditation, division, infiltration, and intimidation. Ironically, it was the transparent nature of such classic covert subversion methods used by intelligence agencies that eventually led to their discovery.
Likewise, the use of such strategies against the 9/11 Truth movement has once again betrayed the source’s anonymity. Also ironically, such efforts have betrayed their very intent, for the clear and abundant evidence of such a campaign against the 9/11 Truth Movement only lends greater credibility to our claim that 9/11 was orchestrated from within our own government.
In the following video, investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn provides a revealing account of his experience with those dark forces who are willing to go to disturbing lengths to silence the message of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
The introduction of information and ideas with the intent to sabotage a particular group’s agenda is known as “Cognitive Infiltration”. In such psychological operations, misleading evidence is often delivered alongside accurate information. On the other hand, some disinformation promotes ridiculous claims in order to sow confusion and undermine the credibility of legitimate claims and honest truth seekers. Disinformation requires intentionality while misinformation does not. In researching 9/11, you will come across both in the form of evidence, materials, researchers, and groups that either consciously or unconsciously promote false, misleading, or contradictory information.
One clear indication that our own government is behind such Orwellian efforts against the 9/11 Truth Movement is revealed in the following excerpt from the paper, “Conspiracy Theories“, by Cass Sunstein.
“What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5). We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity. Government agents might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”
Some of Sunstein’s other un-American works also include the books, “Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas” and “Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech.” Most disturbingly, as President Obama’s appointed Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Sunstein implemented many government-wide policies, the consequences of which are yet unknown.
Whether people wish to theorize about aliens or 9/11 conspiracies is immaterial. Their right to do so, and to share their theories, beliefs, or simply ask questions and conduct research, is unquestionably protected by the First Amendment. One must therefore wonder why our government would even consider attempting to undermine the efforts of “conspiracy theorists”. Could it be because the truth behind 9/11 poses a serious threat to their grip on power, and possibly even to exposing their criminal complicity in such events? We can think of no other plausible reason.
For someone appointed by the President of the United States to suggest policies that would clearly undermine the Constitutional right of Free Speech, the very foundation of Democracy, is nothing short of spine-chilling. The subversion of American citizens’ right to freedom of expression, whether it be through outright oppression or covert subterfuge, is a traitorous antithesis to the principles of our democracy. Such behavior by our elected officials is a blatant betrayal of their obligation to defend those principles on our behalf, and deserves nothing less than to be called out for what it truly is….FASCISM.
Some of the most common CoIntelPro and PsyOp tactics used by intelligence agencies involve Cognitive Infiltration and Disinformation. Examples of such tactics include:
1. Propaganda: Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, is used to promote a particular political cause or point of view. This is most often accomplished through biased mainstream news reports, White House sponsored but unattributed “news releases”, and movies and documentaries.
2. Straw Man Arguments and Sensationalism: By promoting speculative, sensational, and false evidence, opponents can set up easily debunkable or dismissible points. Disinformation agents typically introduce topics that can be easily countered, or that simply discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
3. Muddying the Waters: Making it difficult to discern the real evidence, researchers, websites from the fake ones both frustrates efforts to understanding the subject and makes the project less focused and more frustrating to be a part of. For example, newcomers to the 9/11 Truth movement confronted with competing hypotheses may become frustrated or dismissive of the whole movement.
4. Guilt by Association and Smear Campaigns: By including the target idea, individual, or movement along with another topic or personality that is disliked or discredited (UFOs, anti-semitism, nazis, etc.), the original subject can be smeared and dismissed. For instance, recognizing a legitimate link to Israeli/Mossad involvement will often be called anti-Semitism even though there is no bias against Jews whatsoever.
5. Introducing Conflict: By introducing conflicting views or opposing assertions between 9/11 Truth members, some people lose sight of the 9/11 Truth mission and spend their time arguing with each other instead of promoting the scientifically provable evidence, i.e., controlled demolition of the Word Trade Center buildings.
6. Introducing Paranoia: By introducing the idea of disinformation agents, some people become suspicious of everyone and everything associated with the 9/11 Truth movement. This can quickly destroy trust among members.
The best way to counter these and all disinformation strategies is to be aware of them, be objective but also maintain a healthy level of skepticism, and always remain focused on hard evidence, such as the scientific proof of controlled demolition of all three the Word Trade Center buildings.
Below are some real-world examples of suspected Cognitive Infiltration and Disinformation efforts being used against the 9/11 Truth Movement:
1. Several high-profile 9/11 researchers have promoted theories that no planes actually hit the WTC towers. Instead, holograms were supposedly used to simulate the plane, and the towers were not demolished by scientifically proven controlled demolition, but rather by “mini-nukes”, “space-beams” , or other “directed energy” weapons. Considering the abundance of evidence that scientifically proves controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings, it simply makes no sense for legitimate 9/11 Truth seekers to promote theories that are not substantiated by facts and that are far too difficult for the vast majority of people to even consider, much less believe. It is therefore our position that these sources represent disinformation, as their proponents should clearly be aware that their efforts will do nothing but discredit the 9/11 Truth movement. For those interested, the following video does an excellent job of disassembling the “No Planes” theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tSShbuYA2s
2. “Criminal Politics” magazine mixes 9/11 truth with anti-Semitism and other right-wing, hateful ideas. It features a mugshot-looking picture of David Ray Griffin (considered by many to be the father of 9/11 Truth) on the cover, with the sarcastic headline, “Can This Retired Theologian Save the United States?” It appears to be nothing but a transparent smear campaign against Griffin and the 9/11 truth movement as a whole.
3. Eric D. Williams was the webmaster and director of the “9/11 Accountability Conference.” He had written books on 9/11, fascism, the matrix, and the London bombings, yet just before the conference he released a new work of Holocaust revisionism. It should go without saying that holocaust denial is not something the 9/11 Truth movement supports or wants any association with.
4. Recently a trailer for a new movie, “WMD at the WTC,” was released on the web. The producers have a prior track record of shoddy “evidence” and their film asserts that “directed energy hydrogen fusion” weapons were used to destroy the WTC towers.
5. There are certain suspect web sites and individuals who almost exclusively link to and associate with one another. The consistency of those who are promoting speculative and ludicrous “evidence” to only refer to others of the same ilk is obviously suspicious. A good exercise is to compare the sites “911review.org” against “911review.com”, and “ae911Truth.org” against “ae911Truth.info.” The “.org” sites existed first, and it clearly appears as though the newer sites were created to counter the information presented in the original sites.
In conclusion, our position is simple…
There is incontrovertible scientific evidence that proves the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. This is supported by thousands of Architects, Engineers, Scientists, and other subject matter experts who have put their professional credibility on the line. Therefore, any source that attempts to refute their claim, downplay its significance, or that focuses instead on promoting theories that have no basis in provable fact, (“directed energy weapons,” “mini-nukes,” “no planes,” etc.), is unquestionable detrimental to the credibility of the 9/11 Truth Movement and must be treated as disinformation.
The focus of legitimate seekers of truth and justice within the 9/11 Truth movement is on facts that can provide prosecutable evidence in a court of law, NOT imaginative theorizing and speculation.
Finally, regardless of your religious beliefs, the following quote is particularly analogous and relevant to the pursuit of 9/11 Truth:
Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and only a few find it. – Luke 13:22-30
Without question, the path that leads through the “narrow gate” to 9/11 Truth relies on incontrovertible facts, hard science, and corroborating analysis by a large body of subject matter experts.